Sorry, that username or password is incorrect.
Join Korey, Ray, and Danielle on DT’s most casual show dedicated to answering your questions from the Toastie community. firstname.lastname@example.org
Both the Old and New testament of the Bible condemn homosexuality as a sin punishable by death.
The Fibonacci sequence shows that matter acts in predictable ways.
I don’t see how this is evidence of a creator.Science does not deal in absolute certainties.
Yes, we are all agnostic because we cannot provide evidence that God exists or does not exist.
If you can not provide evidence for a claim, the honest position is to not believe. Therefore I am an agnostic atheist.
You can get sufficient protein on a vegetarian and even vegan diet.
There are plenty of examples of vegan bodybuilders and athletes. A simple google search will reveal this.
I apologize for not clarifying exactly what I meant, I meant to say that getting protein from meat is significantly cheaper than the alternatives. I agree that there are plenty of options for those who don’t eat meat
Thank you for the reply. I don’t exactly agree with this. The combination of rice and beans (for example, chickpeas) is very cheap and a complete protein. I do agree with you that it is harder balance marco nutrients and cut weight while retaining your muscle mass.
Im sorry but every time Danielle goes on one of her tangents of cosmic psycho-babble I have to stop the video for because I am afraid that my eyes will roll out of my head.
Ray- “Why not believe?”
because I would rather believe things that are true. As far as I know there isn’t enough evidence for god(s) existence so i don’t see that as important to me.
Well it works for him. He never made it out to be something that’ll work for everyone but his own point of view. And I would argue that’s how most of us make decisions. Everything seems to point to this answer so this must be the answer. At least that’s how he feels for believing in God.
I can understand if you or others don’t believe but don’t shit on those who do. He wasn’t saying why all people should believe just why he does
My problem lies on “this must be the answer”. Especially when we know our experiences are faulty and a god claim isn’t falsifiable.
I never shitted on anyone by questioning their methodology. If you honestly think I did any “shitting on” please point me to it because I never attack people. I may explain why I disagree with their beliefs but in my opinion that isn’t “shitting on those that who do”.
Shit on may have been a bit rough. It just seems like you telling him why he’s wrong for coming to his personal decision. You’ll never be satisfied with someone belief in God because it’s not based on logic.
Sorry if I came off harsh to you. I did enjoy the back and forth though
There is no God equation, Danielle. Aghhh it hurts so bad listening to this. The people who actually know math (i.e Physicists, mathematicians, Biologist) are in high numbers atheist and I guess they never have heard of this supposed “God Equation”.
The Fibonacci is not a proof of a creator. It’s proof of recurring natural patterns and that is all. That has no explination on super natural or creator.
I think it’s the confidence that really pisses me off more than anything.
This is the cosmological argument and it’s complete bs. Then you have to ask how that being was created to set the parameters.
all these patterns( which as humans, we are evolved to recognize) happen due to natural forces. Like if something is spinning, it will get a spiral pattern. So,.we can understand pretty well how patterns form,…if anything, this ‘creator’ is not responsible for patterns,..but the forces behind them, which gets us nowhere. And we’re back to ,..some intelligence created the forces of the Universe.
TJ, you can’t say someone who is strictly science base would then go and say they have 100% confidence. Especially when you said that immediately after. Straw men every where.
Danielle, the math that you are referring to is not evidence of a creator. That math represents the natural evolution of biological structures. Of course it can be defined by math because nature is math.